Related%20passage for Eruvin 132:1

אלא לאו דאתא בשבתא וקתני אוסרין ואין מערבין אין מבטלין שמע מינה

Consequently<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Since it is a case where they may not join in an 'erub'.');">¹</span> it must refer to a case where the heathen came home on the Sabbath, and in connection with this it was stated that 'where they do impose restrictions upon one another but may not join in an 'erub they may not renounce their rights in favour of one of them'.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Which proves that renunciation of individual shares in favour of one of the tenants is permissible only where the tenants were allowed to prepare an 'erub on the Sabbath eve. Hence R. Eleazar's astonishment (supra 66a) .');">²</span> This is conclusive. I, observed R'Joseph, have never before heard this reported ruling.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Of Samuel, that in the case of two courtyards the tenants of the inner one may renounce their right of passage through the outer one in favour of the tenants of the latter.');">³</span>

Explore related%20passage for Eruvin 132:1. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.